DISEÑO, CONSTRUCCIÓN Y VALIDACIÓN PRELIMINAR DE UN PROTOTIPO ROBÓTICO PARA LA ENSEÑANZA DE INGLÉS EN EDUCACIÓN GENERAL BÁSICA DEL ECUADOR

Jorge Alvarado Cadena; Leticia Zabala Barragán; Ana Guaño Alvarez

doi:10.59540/tech.vi5.118

Authors

Jorge Alvarado Cadena ISU Carlos Cisneros
Leticia Zabala Barragán IST Carlos Cisneros
Ana Guaño Alvarez IST Carlos Cisneros

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59540/tech.vi5.118

Keywords:

Educational robotics, educational strategy, gamification, English teaching, Raspberry Pi

Abstract

English teaching in Ecuadorian basic education presents limitations with traditional methods, hindering the acquisition of language skills. Given this problem, this project proposes a technological solution based on the design, construction, and implementation of a robotic prototype aimed at teaching English as a foreign language to children. The design phase integrated pedagogical and engineering criteria for the development of an interactive system that facilitates the playful learning of basic English vocabulary. The system's functional modules were defined, including the human-computer interface, control components, and the robot's mechanical structure. The development integrated a Raspberry Pi 4-based architecture with an interactive Python application and an Android remote control application, resulting in a robot capable of limb movement, movement, and interactive applications.

The functional and pedagogical validation was carried out with first-year students of basic general education at the Carlos Cisneros Educational Unit. Through direct classroom observation and interviews with teaching staff, it was found that the prototype significantly increases students' attention and engagement compared to conventional classes. Despite the positive reception, it is concluded that it is essential to optimize the graphic and playful design of the interfaces (Python and Android) to enhance motivation and learning effectiveness in future versions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ministerio de Educación, “Acuerdo Nro. MINEDUC-ME-2016-00020-A” Ministerio de Educación, Quito, 2016.

G. Dionisio, L. C. Pascual, and R. Ilustre, “Vocabulary Acquisition and Learning Strategies in Second Language Learning: A Review Paper” International Journal of English Language Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 58–62, 2022.

O. Adeniyi, A. Olowoyeye, and U. D. Onuoha, “The Effects of Interactive Multimedia on English Language Pronunciation Performance of Pupils in the Nigerian Primary Schools” Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 71–78, 2016.

R. Rojas, “Effectiveness of Teacher-Made Manipulative Learning Materials in Improving the Word Recognition Skills of the Grade 2 Indigenous People Education (IPEd) Learners” International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 311–324, 2023.

C. E. Arrobo Rivera, K. M. Espinosa Muñoz, P. Llivi Llumiquinga, J. L. Pereda Rodríguez, and L. A. Barba Mariño, “Importancia del idioma extranjero en el centro municipal de educación inicial ‘Pequeños Exploradores’ en Cantón Rumiñahui” EFDeportes.com Revista digital, no. 210, 2015.

M. Benitti, “Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review” Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 978–988, 2012.

S. Woo, G. LeTendre, T. Pham-Shouse, and Y. Xiong, “The use of social robots in classrooms: A review of field-based studies” Educational Research Review, vol. 33, 100388, 2021.

M. Alemi, A. Meghdari, and M. Ghazisaedy, “Employing humanoid robots for teaching English language in Iranian junior high-schools”, International Journal of Humanoid Robot, vol. 11, no. 03, 1450022, 2014.

S. Huang, “Design and development of educational robot teaching resources using artificial intelligence technology”, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 116–129, 2021.

W. Yang et al., “Towards inclusiveness and sustainability of robot programming in early childhood: Child engagement, learning outcomes and teacher perception” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1486–1510, 2022.

E. Deci and R. Ryan, “Self-determination theory in psychology” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000.

W.-C. V. Wu et al., “Instructional design using an in-house built teaching assistant robot to enhance elementary school English-as-a-foreign-language learning” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 696–714, 2015.

P. Nugent et al., “Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 391–408, 2010.

K. Wang, G. Sang, L. Huang, S. Li, and J. Guo, “The effectiveness of educational robots in improving learning outcomes: A meta-analysis” MDPI Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 5, 4637, 2023.

J. L. Ramírez-Sánchez and C. Landín-Juárez, “Modelo de Robótica Educativa con el Robot Darwin Mini para Desarrollar Competencias en Estudiantes de Licenciatura” RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana de Investigación y Desarrollo, vol. 8, p. 15, 2017.

G. Urquizo, J. Gavilanes, Á. Llerena, I. Vaca, and L. Villagómez, “Robot publicitario aplicado a la pedagogía infantil” CIENCIA, vol. 21, no. 1, 2019.

J. C. Avilés Díaz and M. S. Ávila García, “Diseño de juegos interactivos y multitáctiles para la enseñanza del inglés” Ciencia y Tecnología, vol. 4, 2018.

S. Shapiro, M. Wilk. “An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)”, Biometrika no. 52 (3-4): 591-611. 1965.

J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. New York. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1988.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, "Using thematic analysis in psychology” Qualitative Research in Psycholy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.

K. Tanaka, F. Takahashi, and H. Suzuki, "Design of a Dual-Mode Educational Robot for Language Learning” IEEE Transaction of Learning Technologies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 720–734, 2020.

R. Van den Berghe, J. Verhagen, O. Oudgenoeg-Paz, S. Van der Ven, and P. Leseman, "Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review” Review of Educational Research., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 259–295, 2019.